On 07.05.19 23:08, Nick Bolten wrote: > This proposal suggests the deprecation of crossing=traffic_signals and > replacing it with crossing:signals=yes, i.e. placing pedestrian > signalization on a dedicated tag that is separate from crossing=* values.
I agree with separating orthogonal characteristics of crossings into different tags. A single tag cannot easily express both the presence of traffic signs and the presence of markings. However, it seems odd to "demote" traffic signals to a sub-tag when their presence or absence is perhaps the biggest influence on the crossing's overall character. In comparison, it seems somewhat less important whether a signalled crossing also has painted markings on the road. So I would suggest using a separate tag for the markings instead. We need a tag for the _type_ of the markings anyway (as different patterns for marked crossings can have entirely different legal meanings in some jurisdictions), and we can use that same tag for presence/absence by also allowing yes/no values. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
