On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:35:09 +0000 marc marc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 08.05.19 à 17:00, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > > sometimes change is applied for months > > > How one may mark that such change is temporary? > > > > It would be useful for at least two reasons: > > - it would easier to catch roads for retagging after road > > recontruction completes > > use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date > with an estimated completion date of the work. > some qa-tools inform about outdated dates. > however, some mappers confuse this tag with start_date, which would > probably require additional analysis (quickly correct or better alert > before uploading when start_date contains a future date instead of > opening_date) > > > - it would be possible to skip such roads in some QA checks - > > I disagree. if change take long enough to be filled in in osm, then > it is probably very useful that routing inconsistencies are > corrected. because it is in the case of tmp change that there is most > often a need for reliable routing instead of using outdated > information A better example of skipping a QA check would be a pair of two-way roads that meet at a corner. One of them is made temporarily one-way for construction, leaving no legal way to drive both directions on the other road. Normally, this would be flagged as a network-connectivity error, but if the one-way-ness of the other road is marked as being temporary, the connectivity error can be ignored. -- Mark _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
