24 May 2019, 14:48 by [email protected]: > OSMF endorses > this as the default way of editing OSM online via the website giving it > an unfair advantage over any competing system of presets and > validation. > Is there some editor capable of working in-browser that can be considered as better than iD that was refused without a good reason? There is Potlatch 2, but relying on Flash immediately makes it worse (even assuming that interface and design is better than in iD).
Or is there some explicit or implicit announcement that iD will be kept as default even in case of something better (like forked iD with some changes to presets and validation rules)? If not, I would not describe it as unfair.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
