On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 18:30, Nick Bolten <[email protected]> wrote: > Notice the extent to which personalisms are being launched. >
Yes. I noticed when you implied that I hated blind people. I noticed when you called me condescending. claims about how mapping these things don't matter, despite the use cases I had repeatedly gone over. I felt that directness was necessary, because that is the implication of these facts: (1) low vision individuals need this information to navigate and pedestrians are safer at marked crossings, and (2) it was repeatedly stated that mapping these things isn't important. These things are important. It's just that some of us think your logic is wrong. They were asked as questions, and there was no response. > YET. Your points seem (to me) to be invalid and self-contradictory at times. I have finally managed to come up with a perversely-pedantic interpretation of "markings" that would make your position consistent, but still deeply flawed (and, in fact, your position would put those with visual impairment at greater risk). And, given your behaviour here, is there any point in me attempting to take this further? Most people here don't seem to see the problems you claim to exist, so why bother? BTW, if we're going to harp on points that were not responded to, what about you poisoning the well by implying I hate blind people? -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
