Hello, in the rational, you said "there are many cases where turn:lanes=* can't provide that information." could you add a case where turn:lanes are included that more clearly shows what the connectivity=* adds ? ideally 2 examples that would have the same turn:lanes value for the "from" way and the same number of lanes on the "to" way but not the same connectivity=* value
Regards, Marc Le 27.05.19 à 18:43, Leif Rasmussen a écrit : > Hi everyone, > I emailed this list a month ago about my proposal (Connectivity > relations), and received a lot of feedback. I have also contacted many > other sources for feedback. I used all of the feedback to make the > proposal much more comprehensive and able to store much richer data > about lanes in OpenStreetMap. > Some new features: > * The possibility of stating whether connectivity is "default", aka > "lane you will end up in if you don't change lanes, take an exit, turn, > or leave an ending lane" > * Conditional connectivity > * Much more clear examples on the page > * Support in iD for not breaking connectivity relations and other > from-via-to relations that don't have type=restriction. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Connectivity > > Please provide any final feedback for this proposal either here on this > mailing list or on the talk page for the proposal. I will likely open > up voting for this proposal in a week or so if I don't see any issues > with the proposal. > > Thanks, > Leif Rasmussen > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
