> The OSMwiki says tourism=caravan_site is not for sites that accept tents > at all.
I think you are mistaken. The wiki page says "They may also have some space for tents. If a site is primarily for tents, it should be tagged as tourism=camp_site". This has always been a part of the page, since 2011. However, the wording of the page was rather confusing. In July 2014, it seems that someone wanted to define this tag as being mainly for a "Reisemobil-Stellplatz", or "Motorhome stopover" rather than for American-style RV Parks - they changed the wikipedia link from [[wikipedia:RV_park]] to [[wikipedia:Motorhome_stopover]]. But tourism=caravan_site tag is also used for full-service RV parks, which usually allow tent campers. I've fixed the page now. > How do you handle sites that accept both caravans and tents on different > pitches? As I said: tourism=camp_site or tourism=caravan_site for the whole area, depending on the most common type of camping offered. If both are about equal, I would personally use tourism=camp_site. > How do you handle sites that accept both caravans and tents on the same > pitch? Are you asking: "how do you tag the individual pitch to show that it can be used for either caravans or tents or both at the same time?" That's not part of this specific proposal. It only includes the single tag tourism=camp_pitch, which can be used for this case - it doesn't distinguish between tent and caravan pitches. However, the old version of the proposal, before I revived it, included a tag "camp_pitch:type=" which could have a value like "=tent;caravan;motorhome" - this would be a toursim=camp_pitch which allows tents, caravans and even large "motorhome" vehicles. We should discuss this if tourism=camp_pitch is approved -Joseph _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
