On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 5:10 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Now, my argumentation is in favour of making a distinction between > unmarked and marked but not explicitly for lanes=0. I wouldn't mind or even > slightly favor a tag like nolanes=yes or similar - this would be even more > explicit. But since this does not exist (yet), lanes=0 would do as well in > my opinion because it also reads as "zero (=no) lanes". > > I think a tag to say "lane:marking=no" could be better for that > situation??? > > lanes=* says the number of lanes, it does not say if they are marked or > unmarked as demonstrated above.
I agree with Warin on this, with the extension that we should be counting all lanes, not some lanes.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
