This is about the equipment available?

Using the principle of 'say what it is' ...

medical_equipment=MRI ??? Assuming the tag is for equipment.

Calling the key health_amenity:type "in use" is a stretch - 40 uses .. and most of these are for first aid kits!
The next most popular is "scales".
Fist aid kits have the tag emergency=first_aid_kit ... which is more popular (170) despite it being a "draft".

No, I don't think is is "in use" nor has it been used in a sensible way. Probably because "type" can mean anything.

health_facility:type has the same problem, despite being more popular, uses are for
dispensary
office
clinic
hospital
etc


On 14/07/19 23:18, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi Mark,

I agree with your choice to specifiy which service are available in a given facility. This doesn't require to add :type in the name of the key. Such suffixe don't bring any information. Your proposal would be way better if you use health_amenit=MRI at least instead

All the best

François

Le jeu. 11 juil. 2019 à 21:10, Mark Herringer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :

    The intention of the tag is to specify physical equipment
    (health_amenity:type=MRI) and should be used in conjunction with
    amenity=clinic to show that the health facility contains that
    specialised equipment. This will enable mappers say that "this
    clinic contains an MRI"
    ᐧ

    On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 08:15, Joseph Eisenberg
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:

        4) health_amenity:type

        I think the key "healthcare" should be used instead of the new key
        health_amenity:type". If it's necessary to tag an MRI facility
        separately, then create a tag like "healthcare=mri".

         However, it may be more useful to use a tag like "mri=yes" on the
        main amenity=hospital or the radiology department within the
        medical
        centre - this tag would let mappers say that "this hospital
        contains
        an MRI" without requiring mappers to precisely locate the MRI
        equipment within the building. This would also make it easier for
        database users: they can just check for "amenity=hospital" +
        "mri=yes"
        rather than doing a spacial query to find MRI nodes within or
        near an
        amenity=hospital feature


        On 6/20/19, Mhairi O'Hara <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        > Hello Tagging Mailing List,
        >
        > We would like to bring your attention and comments on the
        proposal for the
        > staff_count:doctors and staff_count:nurses tags, which helps
        identify the
        > number of doctors and nurses at a given health facility
        [1][2]. The
        > operational_status tag, which has been proposed before and I
        would like to
        > highlight again, as this is used to document an observation
        of the current
        > functional status of a mapped feature (i.e. health facility)
        [3]. The
        > health_amenity:type tag is also being proposed, as this
        indicates what type
        > of speciality medical equipment is available at the health
        facility [4] and
        > the final tag is insurance:health which describes the type
        of health
        > insurance accepted at a health facility [5].
        >
        > Some of these are already in use but have never been
        formally accepted, or
        > properly described as to how they should be applied, which
        we would like to
        > try and achieve if possible for the Healthsites.io project.
        Please take a
        > look at the proposal pages on the OSM Wiki, as well as the
        Global
        > Healthsites Mapping Project page [2] which is at the core of
        the recent
        > work focused on creating a health facility data model. We
        look forward to
        > discussing these proposals on the respective Wiki discussion
        pages.
        >
        > Kind regards,
        >
        > Mhairi
        >
        > [1]
        >
        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:doctors
        > [2]
        >
        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:nurses
        > [3]
        >
        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:operational_status
        > [4]
        >
        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:health_amenity:type
        > [5]
        >
        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:insurance:health
        > [6]
        >
        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Global_Healthsites_Mapping_Project#Tag_Proposal
        >
        >
        > --
        > *Mhairi O'Hara*
        > Project Manager
        > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > @mataharimhairi
        >
        >
        > *Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team*
        > *Using OpenStreetMap for Humanitarian Response & Economic
        Development*
        > web <http://hotosm.org/>
        >  |      twitter <https://twitter.com/hotosm>
        >  |      facebook <https://www.facebook.com/hotosm>
        >  |      donate <http://hotosm.org/donate>
        >



-- Kind regards
    Mark Herringer


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to