It is better to document the meaning of a property tag at its own wiki page, so tools like Taginfo can make use of the description, but a tag used only a handful of times does not need to be added to major feature pages without discussion.
I’ve made a page for key:educational now, so it will be documented, since it’s been added to 17 routes in the past 14 months. Joseph On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 9:52 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17/08/19 03:55, s8evq wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 20:37:56 +0900, Joseph Eisenberg < > joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> The key "educational" has only been used 25 times, mainly > >> "educational=yes", and does not have a wiki page, so it would be best > >> to remove it from the route pages. > >> > > That's OK for me. Anybody who's againt removing it from the the tagging > scheme? > > It is obviously something mappers want to indicate. If it has no > documentation then it will get used in lots of different ways .. not all of > them that useful. > As this is the only documentation for it I think OSM would loose > information from its removal. > > route:educational=yes could be a better tag? > I prefer trying to make good tags that people can use, even of the use is > low, as good tags are better than poor tags. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
