Anyone else have any opinion, in favor or against adding amenity=childcare to the wiki page Map Features, and to Template:Map_Features:amenity?
If there are any concerns, I can make a proposal to discuss it fully, but if no one objects after 2 weeks, then I will add it. (Unless anyone objects to this process) On 8/25/19, Valor Naram <[email protected]> wrote: > why not. Babykarte has also support for `amenity=childcare` > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Tagging] Add amenity=childcare to Map Features? > From: Joseph Eisenberg > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > CC: > > >> The tag amenity=childcare is fairly popular (used 17,000 times), and >> it's supported by the iD editor and the Openstreetmap-carto rendering. >> >> Should this tag be added to the wiki page Map Features? >> >> The original proposal wasn't supported because some people thought >> that amenity=kindergarten should be used for all types of childcare, >> not only preschools/kindergartens. This seems to be the common >> situatoin in Germany, but may not match they types of daycare / >> childcare / preschool facilities available in other countries. For >> example, in the USA most preschools do not take older children after >> school; such after-school care is usually provided by separate >> programs. >> >> Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare >> Proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare >> Compare to Kindergarten: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
