On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 14:31, Janko Mihelić <[email protected]> wrote:
> The rule I'm trying to implement, "A Wikidata item cannot be connected to > more than one OSM item", might also be interpreted as a DRY rule. But I'm > at least proposing part:wikidata, so we can have the benefits of DRY, as > well as easiness of tagging WET tags. > I think we have different people understanding this in different ways (or I'm misunderstanding them). So this is how I see it... Firstly, we're talking about Wikipedia's wikidata, and objects are tagged with wikidata=*. We're not talking about the wikidata OSM's own wiki maintains. I don't think anybody has confused the two so far, but at one point I wasn't sure until I re-read a sentence. Rule 1: We only tag terminal instantiations which are unique objects, not categories. It is appropriate to use wikidata=Q275 for the Forth Railway Bridge; it is not appropriate to use wikidata=Q8471277 (category railway bridges) for the Forth Railway Bridge. Nor is it appropriate to use wikidata=532 (category village) for a village which does not have its own unique wikidata reference. Rule 2: "Lesser" objects goegraphically within an object that has a wikidata entry do not inherit that wikidata entry. If the wikidata entry is for a particular town then objects within the town do not also get that wikidata tag. My street is within the town of Cardigan but does not get the wikidata tag for Cardigan, nor does a lamp post on that street, nor does my house. Two reasons: first, it would lead to a massive proliferation of tags; second, an article about Cardigan doesn't tell you about my house or the nearby lamp post. Rule 3: If an object is a multipolygon relation containing several outers, such as some university campuses, then the relation itself gets the wikidata tag for that university, not the constituent polygons. Rule 4: For city states it all depends on whether the wikidata item is for the city, the state, or the city state. In this case I'd be willing to use the same wikidata tag for a city state on two different OSM objects (the city and the country), but others will disagree. I'm guessing that of all the objections I'm going to get, most will be about rule 3. Because I can see reasons to have it both ways. So maybe it's not a rule, just a suggestion. Or maybe I'm missing the whole point of what you're trying to do. Wouldn't be the first time. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
