On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:29:04 +0200 Janko Mihelić <[email protected]> wrote:
> pet, 13. ruj 2019. u 17:31 Paul Allen <[email protected]> napisao je: > > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 09:45, Janko Mihelić <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > The correct way to group them is with a relation. If we don't have > > a suitable type of relation then propose one. > > > > My idea was to expand the general "part:wikidata=*" to more specific > tags. For example, give all peaks and ridges of a mountain the > mountain:wikidata=* tag, instead of part:wikidata=*. Part is just the > first, nondescript step. If we decide on a better tag, we replace the > part:wikidata with the new XXX:wikidata=* "Part of" is frequently ill-defined. To take your "mountain:" example, mountain-climbers consider Little Tahoma to be a mountain, while geologists consider it to be a satellite peak of Mount Rainier. Given that, how do you decide if Fryingpan Glacier is a "mountain:wikidata=Q1367080" or a "mountain:wikidata=Q194057"? -- Mark _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
