On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:35:45AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > explicit access tagging for barriers is generally preferable because > it reduces the uncertainty. > > Still if there is a barrier and no access tags are set you will have > to figure out how to deal with it. > > For bollards I agree it is likely that pedestrians can pass. For other > barriers like gates or even ropes/chains, it will not be possible > without access tags to understand when you can pass, even as a > pedestrian.
I dont like rules with too many exceptions - thats the point. I agree that bollards are a little obvious as a pedestrian will most likely be able to pass. But for the sake of simplicity i would rather call for only explicit tagging so people can process barriers whatever they are called - No if/then/else/otherwise/maybe spaghetti in all data consumers. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected] UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
