30 Sep 2019, 09:33 by [email protected]: > Am Mo., 30. Sept. 2019 um 03:41 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny <> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >: > >> >> >> know that on the 'tagging' list there are hard-liners who would even >> challenge adding the peaks' names to the list, on the grounds that the >> names for the most part cannot be observed in the field. (Look at a >> topo map, or ask virtually any local 'what mountain is that big one?' >> while pointing, and you'll get an answer, but for many of these peaks >> I don't think I've ever seen a sign with the name, so I've been told >> that in such a case the name is not verifiable!) >> > > > IMHO this would represent just a small minority of people thinking so. > Generally verifiability would be satisfied if you could go in the area and > ask the people, there is no requirement for a sign. > Allowing solely signed names is ridiculously extreme, it sounds like a misunderstanding.
Maybe it was intended as "locally signed name is more important than desires of an individual/organization/government".
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
