sent from a phone
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 15:40, Colin Smale via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > > In that case it makes perfect sense to consolidate onto one or the other. But > if there are any perceived semantic differences, however subtle, then either > we find some way to represent that using other tagging, or we accept that a > certain nuance will be lost. > there could be phone numbers with automatic announcements, so “phone” will still be valid, but contact:phone would not suit well. To give an example. It cannot be seen from the “phone”-key that this is the case though. I’m happy with loosing the subtle differences that may make “contact:”-prefixed tags slightly more specific, in exchange for more universally usable “almost-equal” more generic tags without the prefix. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
