On 07/12/19 14:09, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 13:07, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 7. Dec 2019, at 01:51, Peter Elderson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think a simple oneway=yes on a hiking route relation could say it's signposted for one direction.I would prefer being more explicit in the tag name, e.g. sign_direction=forward/backward/both pedestrian_oneway=yes or maybe oneway:foot=yesWhere it's a restriction on the walking path, then oneway=yes on the way, when it's a restriction on the route a oneway=yes on the route is the way to go.
If oneway=yes is placed on a route relation then any excursions and appropriate approaches will have to be separate relations. Meaning there will have to be a super relation to combine them...
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
