On 09/12/19 10:12, Martin Scholtes wrote:
Am 08.12.2019 um 05:04 schrieb Alessandro Sarretta:
Hi Martin,
my doubt on your proposal is that I think the only useful value would
be "designated" (anyway, can you share any example/picture of a sign
describing a park specificly designated for carpooling?). But in this
case I'd support
you can have a look at a sign for such a parking lot which is explicitly
built and maintained for carpooling under the following link:
https://mitfahren.rlp.de/fileadmin/_processed_/2/3/csm_Mitfahrerparkplatz_LBM_3_2_b8add83c7b.jpg
As far as I know, in a general-use parking (without specific access
conditions) anyone can park, meet with a friend, and then continue the
journey with only one car... What is the purpose to explicitly add
this information?
Parking spaces that have been explicitly created for car pools are built
and maintained by the state. Furthermore, this type of car park does not
exist everywhere, mostly only at points where many commuters meet. It
makes the search easier. Because at the moment such objects can only be
found by a possible name, for example "Mitfahrerparkplatz".
As far as I can see those parking places are available for all to use.
So tag as;
amenity=parking
carpool_parking=yes ??
The name is not Mitfahrerparkplatz, at best that is a description. We don't use
name=parkplatz ?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
