On 16/12/19 20:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 10:02 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
Can we come back to talking about a solution.
Maybe an appropriate new role value could be a solution:
role=take_train on the corresponding train section in the bicycle
route, for example.
However, this would provide an easy way to add train ride details.
I would add the train route relation as member, rather than the
individual railway ways.
If the entire train route is used then ok. But if only a section is used
then I think the relevant ways only should be included.
If a simple dataconsumer is not aware, it would should a hole in the
bicycle relation (what IMHO is a good way to show that there is
something special, in particular that you cannot simply ride your bike
there), while a data consumer who specifically understands the
situation could give specific directions. I agree a specific role also
seems reasonable (could be extended to ferries, trams, aerialways, etc.)
role=take_train would not work for ferries, buses, canoes etc.
I think role=transport could work .. provided the way identifies what
form of transport is used ... that could be a problem for bus routes?
role=transport_train/transport_bus???
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
