On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:45, Francesco Ansanelli <franci...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Il gio 19 dic 2019, 21:28 Phake Nick <c933...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> The current usage is that, "Use roundtrip=yes to indicate that the start
>> and finish of the route are at the same location". As in a route from Paris
>> to Milano to Frankfurt then back to Paris would be tagged as roundtrip=yes.
>> You have edited the wiki against established usage to make it become a no.
>> A word used as a key isn't perfect doesn't mean you can suddenly edit the
>> wiki to change its definition without regard of all the established usage
>> in the osm database.
>>
>
> The question is, current tagging respect original author intention?
> Unlucky Roundtrip change meaning between American and British English
> afaict.
> I've discussed also with another mapper and we agreed to fix wiki in order
> to avoid further misunderstandings.
>
>
>
>> 在 2019年12月20日週五 01:21,Francesco Ansanelli <franci...@gmail.com> 寫道:
>>
>>> Dear Volker,
>>>
>>> I haven't change the meaning of Roundtrip, but just reworded to clarify
>>> it.
>>> Roundtrip yes is not a closed loop...
>>> Please check this discussion:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:roundtrip#loop
>>>
>> Francesco,
you have changed the meaning of the tag from inluding the possibility of a
loop to exluding it. And I am aware of a number of (cycling) routes that
are loops and that are tagged with roundtrip=yes accordng to the previous
version of the wiki.
Please revert the wiki.

Furthermore with your new defintion practially or at least many cycle
routes are roundrip routes even though everyone would consdere them as
linear routes. Nearly all "linear" bicycle routes to which I contributed
can be ridden as roundtrip in the sense that they are signposted in both
directions, and care has been taken in those sections where the forward and
the backward route are different by using the foreward|backward roles. The
(fewer) routes with loop geometry as well can be ridden in either
direction.

Volker


>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Francesco
>>>
>>>
>>> Il gio 19 dic 2019, 15:40 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Please relable your "roundtrip" proposal  as such.
>>>>
>>>> Please do not change the meaning of an established tag.
>>>> roundtrip=yes|no is used about 34k times, based on a different definition,
>>>> see
>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes#Relations
>>>>
>>>> Volker
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 15:18, Francesco Ansanelli <franci...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear List,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have updated the roundtrip page and created the closed loop proposal
>>>>> in order to address the misuse of the first tag:
>>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roundtrip
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:closed_loop=yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know what you think
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Francesco
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to