sent from a phone

> On 5. Jan 2020, at 17:06, Rob Savoye <> wrote:
>  Digging around the internet, I see a variety of ways to tag sites like
> this, and a few old unapproved proposals. Since these structures are
> thousands of years old, shouldn't they be 'historic=archaeological_site'
> instead ? Or 'historic=cliff_dwelling, ruins=yes' ?

from my point of view, yes, it is usually preferable to tag ruins with 
historic=archaeological_site (unless they are modern/recent). I’ve myself used 
historic=ruins a lot many years ago and have since changed most of them to 
archaeological site.
I also suggest to add historic:civilization to give more context:

And site_type of course:

I’d see historic=ruins as a very generic fallback when you have no clue what 
you are looking at, but which should ideally be retagged if you do have an idea 
what it is.

Cheers Martin 

Tagging mailing list

Reply via email to