Hi John On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 22:37, John Willis via Tagging <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.31737/139.61884 > > Here is a good example of the kind of situations I have in my area: > > - a service area with two different lots, car and HGV (bus/lorry) adjacent to > each other, with a satellite bathroom for the busses. > - service area is segregated by motorway direction, and labeled as such. This > makes duplicates of everything. They are usually not adjacent, but are in > this case. > - dedicated separated handicap parking > - separate “permissive” lots for people outside the toll system to park and > enter on foot. > - loading zones for deliveries (untagged).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758265853 amenity=parking access=customers bus=designated hgv=designated motorcar=no parking=surface ref=🚛🚌 surface=asphalt As amenity=parking currently is defined as a car park, data users would assume that this is a car park for customers (they likely don't evaluate motorcar=no). Even if amenity=parking weren't exclusive for cars, but for any vehicles, your tagging doesn't mean what you likely had in mind (i.e. a customer parking for buses and HGVs), but a designated parking facility for buses and HGVs (not only for customers) that other vehicles except cars (e.g. tourist buses or motorcycles) can use if they are customers. In order that data understand your example and before we've found a solution for parkings for multiple vehicle classes, i would recommend to tag it as follows: amenity=parking access=no bus=customers hgv=customers Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
