On 16/01/2020 12:57, Paul Allen wrote:
So the wiki says now. It's not what it said in the past. But let's say you're correct. We both know that standard carto doesn't render physical objects with a disused prefix. I, and others, believe that it is important to render physical objects whether they are used or disused because they are navigational landmarks.
I agree.
Joseph's example of a disused water tower is a good one: it's a water tower and it exists and it's visible; whether or not it is in use is of secondary importance (some might even argue it is of no importance and shouldn't be tagged).
Then campaign to get Joseph/Carto to render disused:* prefix. To not use disused:* because Carto doesn't currently render it is the tail wagging the dog. Joseph has already said similar.
I'm unsure why Carto ignores such a popular tagging scheme.
So if you get your way and disused=yes becomes forbidden,
I never said any such thing.
or is treated the same way as the disused prefix by standard carto
I want the opposite.
I don't see any upside to your position but I do see plenty of downside.
TBH, I think you've misinterpreted what I've said. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
