There was an Email from Mateusz Konieczny a bit earlier making a very good point:
There is the general "duty_free=*" and more specific "duty_free:refund=*" tag, but also very specific "duty_free:refund:*=*" tags. In OSM we usually add also the more general tags like this: emergency=fire_hydrant fire_hydrant:position=sidewalk ... And I think this makes also sense for the duty_free-tag when we say "duty_free=yes" means: A traveler doesn't have to pay taxes, either by paying less or by getting them back. When you additionally add "duty_free:refund=yes" (and additionally maybe more specific ones), there wouldn't be a need for a "limited" value. This combination would say: A traveler doesn't have to pay taxes here because the shop offers support in getting them back. A shop at an airport where travelers generally pay no taxes would be tagged with "duty_free=yes" and optionally with "duty_free:refund=no". I hope this also makes sense to you. On 17.01.20 12:27, marc marc wrote: > Le 17.01.20 à 01:32, Hauke Stieler a écrit : >>> I see 3 levels : >>> the customer doesn't pay the tax duty_free=yes >>> the customer pay the tax but the shop help for a refund >>> the customer pay the tax and the shop doesn't help a refund duty_free=no >> >> Exactly, this is the basic idea for the scheme (added these points to >> the wiki page). There might be some special cases, but they're probably >> very rare. > > if so, the level between =no and =yes is imho better tagged > with duty_free=limited like it exist for wheelchair. > it would avoid having incompatible combinations between 2 tags (like > duty_free=yes duty_free:refund=yes... you can't get help for a refund if > you didn't pay the tax at all) > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
