Jan 24, 2020, 13:50 by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 10:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> >> && Deleting a non-functioning fountain node, is discouraged >> But in case of removed structure deletion >> of node is encouraged. >> > > There are some (I'm one of them) who would say that if the fountain is likely > to > be remapped because there are many images of it on the web, then it is better > to retain the node and apply a removed: lifecycle prefix to it (and possibly a > note, explaining things). Others will strongly disagree, saying that OSM > doesn't map history and ignoring that this is actually a quality assurance > mechanism. > Yes, it is acceptable and desirable as long as there is a real risk of mistaken remapping.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
