Usually the bicycle rests on something. And if you going to leave it for
any time then locking it to some thing is a good idea.
Floor may be a poor choice? Flat may be more descriptive? There is
nothing there for bicycles to lean on or be fastened to.
(Yes I know some parts of the world bicycles normally come with stands
so they can be self suporting. But most bicycles hare have no stands.)
On 31/1/20 5:50 pm, Thibault Molleman wrote:
I agree, was pretty confused when I saw that as well (after I had
mapped a bunch of regular parkings and then did some bicycle ones)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 07:46 John Willis via Tagging
<tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking
It lists “floor” as the value for a wide open outdoor space with
no stands or other affordances designated for parking bicycles.
this seems weird to me. the ground / asphalt area next to a
supermarket is not a “floor”.
we use “surface” in car parking lots, and there are many of other
types of indoor tags for tagging when a bike is in a building or
shed (similar to parking=multilevel).
I think that the values be standardized and the wiki changed.
there is 60 uses of (undocumented) =surface and ~260 uses of
(documented) =floor.
we should standardize how we tag parking lots for any vehicle if
it is just a flat outdoor surface.
Javbw
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
