Am Do., 6. Feb. 2020 um 10:16 Uhr schrieb Lionel Giard < lionel.gi...@gmail.com>:
> One problem with multipolygon relation is that by definition you can't put > *node > *it those and you can't put *contiguous buildings* either. How do you > group "node + polygons + multipolygon" (some buildings are a multipolygon > already where the hole is not part of the university ^_^) with other thing > than a site relation ? > It would likely be wrong to cut the hole of a building out from a faculty. You would not add the multipolygon relation to the faculty (if there really is just a building a no grounds around it to add), but the outer way(s) that form the building. For buildings and grounds and even for building parts that are currently mapped as nodes, it doesn't seem disproportionate to ask for mapping as a polygon before they can added to a faculty or department, or do you have any examples for things that shall make up a university subpart which are better represented as nodes? Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
