Whatever the concensus in another discussion was, I think that double negatives will risk confusion, and that *:signed=yes and *:signed=no seems to be a reasonable proposal.
I have noticed that some but not all of the surveillance cameras (city council, I believe) in Cambridge (UK) have signs. __John On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM marc marc <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 19.02.20 à 04:29, Victor/tuxayo a écrit : > > Coincidentally there was a recent discussion[2] about these signs in the > > french mailing list (talk-fr) which lead to adding the following section > > in the page > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=surveillance > > I warn that this addition does not reflect the discussion that took > place on talk-fr, but is "self-declared as consensus" > more than half of the opinions are that a regulatory sign of this kind > is not tourist information (imho I think it is closer to a sign that > announces a pedestrian crossing or a maxspeed zone) > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
