> amenity=social_facility Most amenity=social_facility features are large "facilities" like a homeless shelter or nursing home or hospice.
I don't think that tag is appropriate for a refrigerator. -- Joseph Eisenberg On 2/29/20, Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 2/26/2020 4:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> On 26. Feb 2020, at 08:56, Markus Peloso <mar....@outlook.com> wrote: >>> >>> The amenity=give_box tag is specific for sharing and reusing none food >>> items. Please do not use it for food sharing >> >> +1, although these are somehow similar features from a certain point of >> view, they are also significantly different features from another point of >> view. I am in favor of keeping a distinction on the main tag level. > > The give_box proposal specifically said that food sharing was *not* to > be included in the give_box schema. > > I voted for that, but since then, with the proposal stalled, I ran into > what I'd called a give box for "packaged food & personal care items." > It's labeled "free pantry" but it's not just for food. > https://i.imgur.com/UzhuIBo.jpg (Non-refrigerated, obviously. There were > actually cans of food in here but not visible in this shot.) > > Also hiker boxes -- which were explicitly part of the give_box proposal > -- often have food as well as clothing, gear, books, maps, and fuel. So > maybe the prohibition of food in give_box isn't ideal. > > Regardless, though, I don't think a public refrigerator should be a > subtag of give_box -- it's too distinct. I think > amenity=public_refrigerator makes sense. Using amenity=social_facility > plus a subtag would also be fine I guess. > > Jason > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
