On 28/03/2020 19:16, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
Well, if somebody takes care of rendering [1] OSM data structure,
situation doesn't look so bad.
[1] https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=10!54.7983!-1.3075
Not really - that's just ignoring names on the main map and showing
superrelation names on the right in a separate legend. Try figuring out
from
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=11!53.1028!-0.8416
which "NB" is which without using the mouseover highlight.
I ended up having to code specifically for the data (something you
couldn't do internationally).
https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L6170
means that at
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=53.09613&lon=-0.9523
route 645 just gets a ref but "National Byway (Southwell Loop)" gets a
name, so that you can see at
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=53.13343&lon=-0.84475
which one is which.
Interestingly I'd say that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1425019 is actually named
correctly. although a quick look at the route suggests that the "phantom
mergers" have been at it again. :(
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
