> I suggest landuse=industrial + industrial=water Perhaps industrial=water_management or =flood_control or something elsemore specific would be better?
I would mainly do this for areas covered in concrete, asphal, stones, roads, levees and other obvious man-made features, surrounded by a fence or wall probably? And map the fence with barrier=fence lines if known. (You can also map the vegetation of the area (grass, scrub, woodland) if it's present, especially if this covers a large area. That would make more sense than describing a large are of woods as industrial=flood_control if it is outside of the levees/dykes and wouldn't actually be flooded.) -- Joseph Eisenberg On 4/15/20, John Willis via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > When mapping stormwater reservoirs and basins here in Japan, they often have > a mappable landuse around them - the land around the basin is controlled, > often with an access road and and fence of some type. > > Mapping the water feature is easy, but what is the landuse of the entire > facility? it is 10% larger than the basin itself. > > > Here is a good example - the small amount of land around this basin > “belongs” to the basin. the access road belongs to it. It is not a park nor > are the access roads for private property. they are just there to access the > basin in an emergency (a breach, cleaning etc). > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791956035 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791956035> <-mapped landuse example > > other examples that could be mapped in a similar fashion: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.28832/139.42927 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.28832/139.42927> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.27943/139.43071 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.27943/139.43071> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.29622/139.39674 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.29622/139.39674> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.34744/139.32669 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.34744/139.32669> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.05560/139.60083 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.05560/139.60083> > > > > In many instances, emergency stormwater basins are in parks or large > factories - making them a feature of that larger landuse. > I'm not talking about these. > > Examples of what I’m not talking about: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/36.2707/139.4148 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/36.2707/139.4148> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.22028/139.64998 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.22028/139.64998> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/36.1037/139.6329 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/36.1037/139.6329> > > > I’m talking about the dedicated land only used for the man-made basins and > no other usage, controlled via barriers, and mappable via imagery. > > I suggest landuse=industrial + industrial=water or similar for all man-made > water related features that isn’t a plant of some kind (ones dedicated to > filtering, treating, or pumping the water). > > similar to landuse=railway, there is more land dedicated to these features > than just the mappable feature itself. > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=industrial#values > <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=industrial#values> > > taginfo says this combination currently has 60 uses (#2 for all “water” > values), and “water_storage” has 1. > > thoughts? > > Javbw _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
