After communicating with lutz from Historic.Place, he told me they
didn't create this heritage scheme, they just adopted it.
I took the opportunity to present him my proposal of refining this
scheme and I got his support to go ahead with it, so I'm presenting it
here in order to make the necessary adjustments with a new proposal.
heritage=* - This is the main tag, which uses the admin_level [not changed].
heritage:operator=xxx - This is the tag for the official operator. I
propose using separators [;] in those cases where an heritage has an
international and a national operator.
heritage:ref:xxx=* - This tag is for the code/number reference of the
operator(s) above. It changes the previous ref:xxx=*
heritage:xxx:criteria=* - This tag is for the classification criteria
used by the xxx operator. It changes the previous xxx:criteria=*
heritage:xxx:inscription_date=* - This tag is used for the date the
heritage was officially registered by xxx operator. It changes the
previous xxx:inscription_date=*
heritage:xxx:designation_title=* - This tag is used for the heritage
title (international or national). This is new and is an attempt to
circumvent the use of protection_title=* which is wrong in this context.
heritage:xxx:website=* - Used for the heritage official website
(international or national).
Regards,
António.
Às 17:49 de 14/04/2020, António Madeira via Tagging escreveu:
Thanks, Paul.
I'll contact them then.
Às 17:44 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 21:02, António Madeira <antoniomade...@gmx.com
<mailto:antoniomade...@gmx.com>> wrote:
Às 10:15 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
They're the ones you'd have to convince to alter their code to
handle your
proposed change.
You mean this?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
That's where it's documented. The map is here:gk.historic.place
<http://gk.historic.place> If
you've not played with it before, here's a place where I've added most
of the heritage info:
http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/en/index.html?zoom=16&lat=52.03846&lon=-4.46621&detail=3&pid=HaHbHcSaHe
The "problem" with criteria is that it seems to be used with
numbers or abbreviations, like a list that corresponds to some
longer definitions.
That's how others have done it, listing what those abbreviations mean
on the wiki
page. But there's nothing (I can see) that says you have to restrict
yourself to
abbreviations.
Since heritage=* is largely ruled over by the historical places
people, the best
place to get an opinion is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lutz
In the end, he and his team decide how the historical places map
interpret
the tags.
--
Paul
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
