Yes that's true, but then we need a clear definition of what is seen as "public_transport" and what's not, don't we? I think some mappers also use access=private already (I'm not sure whether that fits).
I think this proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Differentiation_for_routes_of_public_transport goes in a direction of that, but note it has nothing to do with aerialway=station.
--Lukas
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. April 2020 um 13:12 Uhr
Von: "Joseph Eisenberg" <[email protected]>
An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] iD semi automatic adding public_transport to aerialway=station
Von: "Joseph Eisenberg" <[email protected]>
An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] iD semi automatic adding public_transport to aerialway=station
I agree that a tag like "public_transportation=yes" would be a
sensible tag to add to a aerialway=station which is used as public
transit, and "public_transportation=no" could be useful for a
"railway=station" or "highway=bus_stop" which is not used for public
transit.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
sensible tag to add to a aerialway=station which is used as public
transit, and "public_transportation=no" could be useful for a
"railway=station" or "highway=bus_stop" which is not used for public
transit.
-- Joseph Eisenberg
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
