May 11, 2020, 10:06 by [email protected]: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 11. May 2020, at 03:18, Jarek Piórkowski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Similarly if you were doing an analysis of surface area devoted to >> public parking then you also need to know to check for >> access!=private. >> > > > this is indeed an unfortunate choice. Tagging a private access parking with > amenity=parking is similar to tagging the shower in your home as > amenity=shower or your kitchen sink as amenity=drinking_water. > Not really. Private parking are worth mapping - it is stiil useful for orientation, data analysis, QA (private parkings vs unmapped) etc Tagging private showers, kitchens and toilets is unacceptable and should be deleted if spotted. (note that some amenity=toilets + access=private should be retagged to access=customers rather than deleted)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
