On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:37 PM brad <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, but it seems redundant to me. A trail/path get tagged as a path. > There's a trailhead and a sign, it gets a tagged with a name. Why does > it need to be a route also? >
Same reason all 0.11 miles of I 95 in Washington DC is part of a route. It's part of a route.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
