On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:26:07PM -0700, Tod Fitch wrote:
> dog=yes|no|leashed already exists for a totally different semantic (letting 
> dog owners know if their pet is allowed).
> 
> If this goes forward I would prefer reversing thing and make it hazard=dog. 
> That would also allow other types of hazards to be mapped.
> 
> Checking taginfo it seems hazard=* [1] is in use. Why not go with it?

You beat me to it. The existing hazard tag is the obvious choice which I
use quite often. Although it does not seem to be well supported by data
consumers. I have used it in Cornwall to flag open mine shafts, and in
one case to warn of dangerous (illegal) dogs on a right of way through a
farmyard.

ael


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to