Hello, Il giorno mar 19 mag 2020 alle ore 16:57 Martin Koppenhoefer < [email protected]> ha scritto:
> Am Di., 19. Mai 2020 um 14:55 Uhr schrieb Rossella Di Bari < > [email protected]>: > >> Hi! I am Rossella, an italian neo-mapper, nice to meet you :) >> In Talk-It [1] we get into a debate on vouchers, provided by the >> Government, for the purchase of essential goods, to support the families in >> need in COVID time. >> The vouchers are similar to SNAP or food stamps, they can also be used to >> purchase essential supplies like medicines (not just for food) and entitle >> to a certain percentage discount. >> > > > right > > > >> I am posting here because it came forward the need to tag supermarkets >> and pharmacies that accept the COVID vouchers as a payment method and it's >> time for a broad debate. >> Searching on Taginfo [2], i have found >> payment:service_vouchers:covid19=yes used only 5 times and it seems to >> be the most suitable tag because these specific vouchers: >> >> - are a payment method; >> - (in my opinion) can be considered a service_voucher as "a financial >> instrument which allows a public authority to target social services at >> those it deems in need" [3]; >> >> > > if you read along the wikipedia page you have quoted, it says about the > services "These might include for example home care > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_care>, household repairs, ironing > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironing>, or bicycle > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle> hire and repair." > > "Food" you buy in a supermarket is not a service, neither pharmaceuticals > are. It would be a service to deliver your purchase at your home, but the > things you buy can not be regarded a "service", and the > payment:service_voucher tag (IMHO) does not apply to these vouchers you > want to map the acceptance of. > I have to partially agree with Martin, even if the "meal vouchers" definition is too strict for the case in subject. How about a simple: "payment:voucher:covid19=yes" As I've already noted the tag: payment:service_vouchers:covid19=yes should be written without the extra "s": payment:service_voucher:covid19=yes and I could live with it, if we fix them all (5). Are you sure there is a distinct category of objects that accept "buoni > spesa" for COVID, that is not identitcal with the list of those objects > that accept payment with "reddito di cittadinanza" (more general social > care, not related to COVID)? I think I have read they are the same (but it > could eventually depend on the region). If there are no differences, we > could map the acceptance of food vouchers for COVID the same as we map > acceptance of reddito di cittadinanza (i.e. the latter would imply the > former and would not require explicit mapping). > First of all, I think COVID-19 mapping should be suffixed by ":covid19" and should never be assumed by default even if similar services are given, then please also mind that "reddito di cittadinanza" is AFAICT a debit Mastercard: https://confcommerciogorizia.it/2019/06/14/reddito-di-cittadinanza-2019-in-quali-negozi-si-potra-spendere/ At the bottom of the page you can see how the voucher are (last picture): http://www.comune.cuneo.it/emergenza-covid-19-a-cuneo/spendiamoci-buono-spesa-alimentare.html My only concern is that in my opinion, these vouchers cannot be spent outside of the municipality that printed it, so I would also encourage a tagging scheme like this: payment:(service_)voucher:covid19=yes payment:(service_)voucher:issued_by:covid19=Comune di Cuneo Cheers Francesco > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
