By the way, superroute relations in JOSM now show continuity correctly if the last node of the last way is the same as the first node of the first way in two sequential route relations. (It was a feature request I made and someone developed it).
Jo On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:47 PM Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For now, I just want an alternative for the section/segment/leg numbers > or refs that are often in the name tag now. > > They are there to get neat ordered lists in tools and applications. That > seems to work fine, but it abuses the name tag, which I am told is a > problem for searching routines. A name tag should contain a proper name as > found on the street, and nothing else, that's the short version of some > very long rants I have encountered... > > > > At the moment, I move comments, descriptions, distance and trail refs to > the appropriate tags. > > From-via-to information I copy to the from, via and to tags. > > I just need a nice and intuitive tag to copy the ordering information to. > > If the section number is an official identifier, then it's a ref (or > possibly an unsigned_ref). There should be no collision because > nothing keeps a superroute from having a ref of its own. > > If you're identifying a section number in order to sort the members of > a superroute, Don't Do That. Keep the superroute in order. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/919642 remains a worked > example; the sections are listed from south to north. Route relations > are ordered; they're not just buckets of members. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
