sent from a phone
> On 29. May 2020, at 12:57, Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I think I had a different photo in mind. It's pretty clear that the > footway is associated with the road, so if you have access to the road, you > can walk on that footway. I cannot see this. To me there is a sequence road, lawn, footway, identical lawn, house, and no indication where a potential boundary between private and public would be located. I’m pretty sure the building is private though ;-) > But between the footway and the house you have to assume it is associated > with the house, do you? Because this is the “typical” situation, or are there more hints? > You have to assume you have no right to be anywhere, unless you have reason > to believe you are allowed. That's the law (in England and NL at least). that’s a sad law, in Germany it’s the opposite: you may assume you can be everywhere unless you have reason to believe it is forbidden. Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
