On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM brad <[email protected]> wrote: > > It already says this: > "Some highway=track are used for various leisure activities - hiking, cycling, or as jeep/ATV trails. " > on the track wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack Right, there is nothing that says that a track cannot be used for additional purposes, only that its primary function is agricultural or forestry.
> I propose changing the path page from this: > "If a path is wide enough for 4-wheel-vehicles (wider than 2 m), and it is not legally signposted or otherwise only allowed for pedestrians, cyclists or horseriders, it is often better tagged as a highway=track or highway=service. " > > to this: > "If a path is wide enough for 4-wheel-vehicles (wider than 2 m), it is often better tagged as a highway=track or highway=service. " 1) So we are getting away from the whole notion of "functional classification"? highway=track will only be a proxy for some physical/legal access characteristics? 2) If we are going to use this definition I would propose stronger language than "often better tagged", perhaps "should almost always be tagged." Mike
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
