On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 11:31, Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 02:10, Mike Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think anyone is saying that tracks can't have additional uses, >> just that one of those uses has to be forestry, agriculture (and maybe >> mineral extraction/energy). >> > > They HAVE to have one of those uses? Really? No exceptions. >
Sorry, I could probably worded that better, but a number of our tracks follow power line / gas pipeline easements, but are open to the public to use. Others branch off from a road, through the bush down to a fishing / swimming spot on the creek / river / dam. Others cross through private property, but are an accepted way to get from here to there, & are in some cases even named, despite being 4wd only & track type 3 - 5! I suppose "farm" tracks that go around the various paddocks on a property could be called agricultural, but they are usually just a means of getting to those areas, & are frequently open to the public on a "permissive" basis. So I'm sorry, but I have to emphasise that all tracks are not for forestry or agricultural use only. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
