What about a plate that remembers a police officer that was killed in 2002?
regards m. On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 3:28 PM Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 08:11, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> you are raising the bar higher than it is. Every memorial is tagged as >> historic for example. > > > That is not a good argument. It is not (usually) the memorial itself which > is of > historic interest but the event or person it commemorates. > > For example, this plaque was unveiled in 1993: > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cardigan_Eisteddfod_Plaque.jpg > The event it commemorates took place in 1176 and is considered to be > of great cultural and historical significance: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1176_Cardigan_eisteddfod > > That plaque could be destroyed by a car driving into it and be replaced by > a new plaque. That new plaque would still qualify as historic=memorial > the moment it was installed, because the historical interest is in the event > it commemorates. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
