I am not saying it's functional, but it is legally consequent. When this stretch of foot-cycleway is busy, what happens is indeed that cyclists get stuck behind pedestrians. It using line with the definition of shared foot-cycle-ways: these are, legally, sidewalks on which bicycles are tolerated, but pedestrians have precedence and cyclists have to dismount if necessary.
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 21:05 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging, < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Jun 24, 2020, 18:05 by [email protected]: > > On 24. Jun 2020, at 15:43, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have just found a situation with mandatory oneway for pedestrians (and > cyclists). > https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/u7_0bEMY-iMrHiuafltvmg > > > > what makes you believe this is mandatory oneway for pedestrians? Looks > like a regular oneway restriction according to the Italian CdS (i.e. > applying to vehicles). AFAIK the CdS does not foresee oneway provisions for > pedestrians. > I could be wrong, but the picture doesn’t seem to prove otherwise > > And making illegal for pedestrians to let bicycle pass them > (by moving to a different lane) would make > this infrastructure even more dysfunctional. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
