thanks for the constructive suggestions :) Den Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:14:21 +0200 skrev Re: [Tagging] Automated edit of image tags suggestion:
> sent from a phone > > > On 25. Jun 2020, at 19:59, pangoSE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > image=File:* -> commons_file=File:* image=Category:* -> > > commons_category=Category:* > > image=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:* -> > > commons_file=File:* > > image=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:* -> > > commons_category=Category:* > > > splitting commons into files and categories (different keys) seems to > be an improvement, although neither of these keys are existing at the > moment. Following what we have so far, “wikimedia_commons_file” and > “wikimedia_commons_ category“ would fit better, although a bit > unwieldy. Fixed in algorithm 2 in the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/pangoSE#Key%3Aimage > > From a datauser perspective, does it really improve the situation? Yes. Commons image-urls can be specified so that a certain size is returned. If the commons-url is in the image-tag I have to first match it with a regex, which is an extra step. Some image tags have multiple urls also which also has to be dealt with, etc. Its a mess from a dataconsumer viewpoint. I experienced it myself making this: https://github.com/pangoSE/sheltermap > Right now you have to check for 2 “main” keys: image and > wikimedia_commons (leaving wikidata out for the moment), and then you > can see what you find in the value (url, file: category: etc.) after > your proposed edit you would have to check for more keys but could > hope that the values would be better standardized. And you’d have to > run a bot frequently to keep things “clean”. Is there anything preventing us from running bots (with simple algorithms) on the database? Wikimedia projects do that all the time. I rarely see this in OSM (besides the http/https bot) > > Btw, there are also a few images tagged with a “flickr” key (~1200) > While it could eventually make sense to make an exception for > wikimedia commons, I do not believe we should create a new key for > every image hosting service. For me there are 2 categories: sites hosting free images like Flickr, Mapillary and Commons and all the rest. All the rest can be in the image tags. The 3 before mentioned should be kept in their tag if not for other reasons for statistical purposes. I'm not advocating creating any more tags for other services here. Cheers pangoSE _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
