Here in Portugal, is very common for Town Halls to promote graffiti
festivals, with buildings and public spaces assigning spaces where urban
artists can do their artworks.
There are world renowned Portuguese graffiters thanks to this subculture
that it's present in almost every Portuguese city. (Vhils is just one of
them -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vhils)
So, we could suggest that a notable graffiti should be a recognizable
and authorized painting, because that would imply that it's both notable
and durable. It should also be a work of art that it's "naturally"
inserted in the urban landscape, without being mere vandalism or
something that could disappear in days.
Às 13:24 de 02/07/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
sent from a phone
On 2. Jul 2020, at 16:12, Jarek Piórkowski <[email protected]> wrote:
If this was a monument, what would we consider a much taller sculpture
yes, I’ve also some examples
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Treptower_Ehrenmal,_Tag_des_Sieges_2015,_01.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holocaust_Memorial_Berlin.JPG#mw-jump-to-license
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barbarossa_Turm.jpg
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Laboe-1936-HWI01.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ad/ArcoCostantinoRoma.jpg/400px-ArcoCostantinoRoma.jpg
not sure if this qualifies as well:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kheops-Pyramid.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
