sent from a phone
> On 15. Jul 2020, at 16:17, Matthew Woehlke <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15/07/2020 03.33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> Also you should not have 2 objects amenity=parking which cover the same >> area (regardless of additional tags). > > Do you mean having that on both the relation and the areas? yes, you should have it only on the relation > >>> two parkings operated by the same >> business, not one parking spread over 2 areas. > > Okay, I'm curious now, how would you treat > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117565094 and > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117565096. IMO those are both part of "the > same lot", split across a road, or at least they are parking for the same > place (SPAC) they are both parkings for the same place, but you can see them as 2 different parkings, one east, the other west of the road. > > Of course, now that I've mentioned it, how do you note that 2 out of 20 > spaces are maxstay=15? (I've seen that...) if there are tags for stating this on the whole parking, I am pretty sure almo nobody will be evaluating it ;) you could map the 2 individual spaces with the parking_space tag and the maxstay. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space Generally I would agree with Paul, maxstay of a few minutes isn’t actually a „parking“ Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
