On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 14:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> 22 Jul 2020, 14:24 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 13:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> bicycle=explicit_no sounds to me like "there is an explicit sign
> forbidding this",
>
>
> Indeed.
>
>
> not "bicycle vehicle itself is prohibited, not just cycling".
>
>
> That sounds like bicycle=prohibited. :)
>
> Maybe prohibited_item?
>

Would bicycle=contraband work? It's stretching the definition a little, but
does have the emphasis on 'prohibited item' rather than 'prohibited mode'.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to