Thanks! > Secondly, I think having to evaluate the history is a challenge. But do > you have to?
No, I don't have to, thanks to such tags as check_date. But then again, check_date, survey:date etc. only came to be invented because API support was missing. It would be better to have somthing like that in the API itself. I would welcome it. > In comparable cases (non-OSM, but comparible checking schemes), I do not > record the date it has been checked, I record the future date when it > should be checked (again). Interesting approach, but what tag do you use for that? It sounds like you use check_date for that, but check_date is documented as "The tag is intended to document the last date, when an object as a whole or specific tags of the object were checked and verified". Cheers Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
