On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 16:10, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is no part of a pier on land. Not according to the wiki: "A pier is a > raised > walkway over water..." and "Lastly, connect the pier with other ways on land, > otherwise it will result in a "island" that can't be used for routing." The > wiki > then goes on to give a misleading or contradictory mention to connecting > to the last node of the pier on land. > > Since your pier connects to a footpath, replace the bit of the pier on land > with a closed way tagged area=yes + highway=pedestrian, or similar > (I don't know if area=yes + highway=footway works). Just because > the surface the person walks on is continuous doesn't make the bit > that's on land a pier.
This is not in line with current usage in OSM, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172671466 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30726754 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/626640755 --Jarek _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging