On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 11:55, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > as it is stated in the page, you should not do it. Having the individual > trees mapped does not change the property of the road as being tree lined. > Similarly, you can map individual trees within a tree row, but you do not > have to. > If that is the case, I don't see the purpose of this tag. If it's a case of one or the other then it serves a purpose: you can avoid tediously adding the tree rows and instead add the tree-lined property to save time. It seems pointless and redundant to permit both, and is likely to lead to data inconsistencies over time: trees get removed so the way tagged as a tree row is removed but the mapper doesn't notice the tree-lined property on the object. I'm also doubtful about the utility of the tag anyway. How close do the trees have to be for an object to be tree-lined? Exactly on the periphery/? Within a metre? Two metres? Ten metres? A kilometre? What if the trees line only three of four sides? Or there are sizable gaps for the entrances? -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
