On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 15:03, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sent from a phone > > > On 21. Aug 2020, at 15:18, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > > > > That's a tautology (consider: footway=walkway) > it is not a tautology, it’s a subtype [We were discussing the suggestion: footway=canopy_walkway ] What type of footway is not a walkway? What type of walkway is not a footway? The two terms are synonyms; using them twice is therefore a tautology. > > or better: > > > > footway=treetop > suggests the top of trees, That is not how the term is used in (British, at least) English, as a Google or similar search for "treetop" will show. > i.e. would be less suitable for raised walkways in the middle or lower part > of trees, wouldn’t it? No. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
